Monday, 17 December 2012

PSI and AIAS Affiliation


October-November 2012

" .. advocates of transparency and accountability .. "
(http://principia-scientific.org/about/why-psi-is-a-private-assoc)
and
" .. the illusion of knowledge .. ”

UPDATES (see Appendix B for earlier updates)

2014-08-29 In Section 1.0, entry 3 a reference has been added to an E-mail from the records office of Northampton University on 22nd Nov. 2012 refuting John O'Sullivan's claim to have been a lecturer there.
2013-07-11 E-mails added, including AIAS founder Dr. Myron Evans asking that PSI  " .. should remove all AIAS names .. " from the list of " .. member biographies.


This article supplements information provided in "SpotlightON - PSI and PSI Acumen Ltd" Section 4.0 "Over-ambitious and Misleading Membership Claims" at http://globalpoliticalshenanigans.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/spotlighton-principia-scientific.html).


"this group has damaged the credibility of skepticism about climate change and provides a convenient target when people want to refer to “deniers” and crackpots"
Professor Judith Curry

"The struggle for truth continues"
John Anthony O'Sullivan

"A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on."“The truth is incontrovertible, malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end; there it is.”

Winston Leonard Spencer-Churchill
(http://jpetrie.myweb.uga.edu/bulldog.html)


Section 1.0 of this article provides copies of the several relevant entries provided within Dr. Myron Evans’s blog about the brief affiliation between AIAS and PSI.

Section 2.0 includes a selection of responses from those AIAS members who are also claimed to be members of PSI regarding their status within PSI.

Section 3.0 addresses affiliations between AIAS and other organisations such as the Telesio - Galilei Academy of Science. Both Sections 2 and 3 are "works-in-progress". 

Appendix A presents relevant E-mail exchanges with PSIA members regarding the claims to their membership of PSI.


1.0 Relevant Entries in Dr. Myron Evans's Blog

This section provides, in reverse chronological order, copies of the several relevant entries provided within Dr. Myron Evans’s blog (http://drmyronevans.wordpress.com/).

===============

Entry posted November 7, 2012 at 7:37 am

AIAS has not Joined PSI

Aftet due diligence AIAS has decided not to join PSI.
==============

Entry  posted November 5, 2012 at 5:59 pm

Repudiation of the Kyoto Accord

This should be the national anthem! I come out against Obama as a U. S. dual citizen.

In a message dated 05/11/2012 16:25:15 GMT Standard Time, writes:

Canada has Dr. David Suzuki who has been instrumental in the creation of the Kyoto Accord. Alberta has a provincial anthem (ha ah!) that goes something like

We are wealthy in Alberta
With our oil and natural gas
They can take Kyoto and
Shove it up Suzuki’s you know what.

Doug

On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 4:53 AM, wrote:

This accord is being essentially repudiated now by the British Government as the uselessness of wind turbines becomes clear. Canada has already repudiated it and I urge all industrialized nations to follow.

British Civil List Scientist

In a message dated 05/11/2012 12:43:33 GMT Standard Time, writes:

Hi John,
Congratulations to one and all! We will cross a milestone tomorrow, in the US Presidential election, 6 Nov 2012.

I am not a fortune- eller, but I expect a quantum leap in post-WWII trends after the United Nations was established on 24 Oct 1945:

1. Falsehoods promoted as consensus “settled” science, and

2. Loss of human rights “protected” by the Declaration of Independence, the US Constitution, and the US Bill of Rights.

I will post empirical dots on the first trend line later today on my web page, after http://omanuel.wordpress.com/about/#comment-1702

The economist, E. M. Smith, reported the facts about AGW yesterday:


“The entire structure of Kyoto was a wealth transfer from Rich nations to Poor nations. It was to hobble the west and enrich those invested in the planned money transfer and industrial movement. That game has played out. It’s a done deal.”

AGW was never about global climate. It has now completed its primary mission.

With deep regrets,
- Oliver K. Manuel
Former NASA Principal
Investigator for Apollo

Date: Monday, November 5, 2012, 4:18 AM

Myron Evans and his team at Alpha Institute for Advanced Studies http://www.aias.us/ (AIAS) are demonstrating commitment and leadership towards our common goal of advancing objective, open science free from political coercion. We now have a great opportunity. PSI will be publishing further articles supportive of the science of AIAS and PSI senior fellow Joe Olson will be taking responsibility for helping grow our knowledge about the AIAS’s work on the unified theory of physics. PSI will also be urging other science associations to take note that the wider scientific community is beginning to accept that our common enemy is faux government science in all its forms. We are better equipped to overcome it by recognizing shared objectives and working together wherever possible. Dr Evans has published an open letter to Joe Olson and PSI at his blog. I recommend it as an uplifting read for everyone wishing to be a part of the resurgence of the traditional scientific method and the defeat of post-normalism:
Thank you,

John
=================

Entry posted November 5, 2012 at 2:51 pm


Legal Precedents


Thanks this will be very useful. I did try for a long time to find a solicitor to advise Lord Carlisle Q. C. Finding a pro bono lawyer seems essential before we start the case. Most people cannot afford legal costs.
In a message dated 05/11/2012 14:41:57 GMT Standard Time, john0sullivan@btinternet.com writes:
Thanks. That helps. I will contact Richard Buxton, SOCME and Brandon Lewis. I particularly want to engage in discussions with representatives of such groups and, where possible, their legal advisers. In my view, the Fenland case would be moot and the dismissed Battle case may assist only insofar as to learn what pitfalls to avoid. My view is that we should source the pro bono services of a Swansea law firm to be on hand at the court as the case progresses. This will mitigate on costs. I will happily initiate such a search. For clarification, although I have a law degree I’m not licensed to practice law in the UK. Most of my experience is in NY human rights and NY employment law (inc. mandamus petitions) plus teaching law in the UK at college level at Northampton University.
http://www.slayingtheskydragon.com


NB: Two weeks later (22nd November 2012) the University of Northampton Records Manager advised that " .. the University has no record of a Mr John A. O’Sullivan being employed by the University .. If you have contact details for Mr O’Sullivan we would be grateful if you could share them with the University because we would like to investigate the issue further with a view to deciding on any legal action .. ". That E-mail was copied to the Director of Human Resources (http://www.northampton.ac.uk/directories/people/deborah-mattock) who had been " .. Lecturer in Law .. a Senior and Principal Lecturer .. " throughout the period (1987-1999) that John O'Sullivan had claimed to have been a lecturer there.


More comments on John O'Sullivan's questionable educational and employment claims (including that questionable LLB that he places ahead of his BA Hon. PGCE) can be found in "Curriculum Vitae for John O'Sullivan (2010)" (http://globalpoliticalshenanigans.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/curriculum-vitae-for-john-osullivan-2010.html), in which Appendix A, Note 4a) gives the full E-mail from the University and Note 2b) discusses the source of that LLB.
================== 

Entry posted November 5, 2012 at 1:05 pm

AIAS / PSI Cooperation

This is most helpful and generous. The worst aspect of contemporary pseudoscience is dogma, this becomes clear over time in the way that refutations of well known but flawed theories are ignored.

In a message dated 05/11/2012 10:18:34 GMT Standard Time, writes:

Myron Evans and his team at Alpha Institute for Advanced Studies http://www.aias.us/ (AIAS) are demonstrating commitment and leadership towards our common goal of advancing objective, open science free from political coercion. We now have a great opportunity. PSI will be publishing further articles supportive of the science of AIAS and PSI senior fellow Joe Olson will be taking responsibility for helping grow our knowledge about the AIAS’s work on the unified theory of physics. PSI will also be urging other science associations to take note that the wider scientific community is beginning to accept that our common enemy is faux government science in all its forms. We are better equipped to overcome it by recognizing shared objectives and working together wherever possible. Dr Evans has published an open letter to Joe Olson and PSI at his blog. I recommend it as an uplifting read for everyone wishing to be a part of the resurgence of the traditional scientific method and the defeat of post-normalism:
Thank you,

John

============

Entry posted November 5, 2012 at 12:31 pm


Cooperation with PSI and AIAS and beyond

It is a pleasure to be part of PSI. For my part I would like to be active both within AIAS and PSI, in theoretical physics and in the European platform for the removal of wind turbines.

In a message dated 05/11/2012 10:18:34 GMT Standard Time, john0sullivan@btinternet.com writes:

Myron Evans and his team at Alpha Institute for Advanced Studies http://www.aias.us/ (AIAS) are demonstrating commitment and leadership towards our common goal of advancing objective, open science free from political coercion. We now have a great opportunity. PSI will be publishing further articles supportive of the science of AIAS and PSI senior fellow Joe Olson will be taking responsibility for helping grow our knowledge about the AIAS’s work on the unified theory of physics. PSI will also be urging other science associations to take note that the wider scientific community is beginning to accept that our common enemy is faux government science in all its forms. We are better equipped to overcome it by recognizing shared objectives and working together wherever possible. Dr Evans has published an open letter to Joe Olson and PSI at his blog. I recommend it as an uplifting read for everyone wishing to be a part of the resurgence of the traditional scientific method and the defeat of post-normalism:
Thank you,

John
==============

Entry posted November 5, 2012 at 7:06 am

Letter to Joe Olsen and PSI

This is an excellent letter from Robert Cheshire and sums up everything in a coherent and lucid manner. No more “conspiracy theories” please.

LettertoPSIFAOJoeOlsen.doc
=============

Entry posted November 4, 2012 at 1:32 pm

Updated PSI Members Page

I think that the PSI membership is very impressive.

Many thanks. The updates to PSI members’ page made as requested and those further AIAS members now added:

http://www.slayingtheskydragon.com
==============

Entry posted November 4, 2012 at 8:38 am

List of Other AIAS Fellows.

This is a list of other AIAS Fellows who have indicated no objection to joining Principia.

1) Robert Fell, Computer Engineer, Swansea. Graduate of Warwick University and extensive industrial experience.
2) Alexander Labounsky, retired Chief Engineer of The Boeing Company, graduate of Columbia University, extensive experience of new energy devices.
3) Dr. Frank Lichtenberg, ETH Zurich, in depth knowledge of ECE theory, currently preparing an invited review for J. Found. Phys. Chem.
4) Michael J. Jackson of Lubbock, Texas, has carried out extensive voluntary work in preparing pdf files from the www.aias.us diary or blog, and interweaving them with feedback data. Extensive knoweldge of low energy nuclear reactions and other aspects of new energy.
5) Stephen J. Crothers, probably the most able scholar in Einsteinian type general relativity, has produced many definitive refutations of big bang, black holes and other fallacies and errors of Einsteinian general relativity.
6) Robert Cheshire, has produced a great deal of voluntary work on behalf of AIAS, including broadcasts of essays and poetry, and fine animations. An able and forceful critic of the standard model of physics. Narrator in the film “The Universe of Myron Evans” (2008) (available on the net).
7) Prof. Emeritus Alwyn van der Merwe, University of Denver, probably the most eminent editor in new physics of the late twentieth century, Editor Emeritus of J. Found. Phys. Chem. Extensive knowledge of B(3) theory, O(3) electrodynamics and ECE theory. Pioneering editor of “Foundations of Physics” and “Foundations of Physics Letters”, probably the best journals in new physics of the late twentieth century. Editor of a well known book series “Fundamental Theories of Physics” with about three hundred volumes published. He was born in South Africa, became a Queen Victoria Scholar, studied theoretical physics in the University of Amsterdam under Jan de Boer ad S. A. Wouthuysen, earned doctorates from Amsterdam and Bern, and was a research associate of Henry Morgenau at Yale University and Hans Jensen at Heidelberg. In 1975 he succeeded Morgenau as editor of “Foundations of Physics” and founded “Foundations of Physics Letters”. He taught at the City University of New York before being appointed at the University of Denver, where he is currently Professor Emeritus. Strong supporter of fairness and balance in publication, read and edited every paper personally, dealing politely but firmly with irrational conduct.
8) Prof. Costas Cefalas, Hellenic Institute Athens, Greek representative for nanotechnology at the EEC. Strong supporter of B(3) and ECE theory and its applications in industry.
9) Franklin Amador, nominated this year for “Marquis Who’s Who in the World”, distinguished engineer, voluntarily typeset volumes of “Generally Covariant Unified Field Theory”, (in seven volumes, Abramis 2005 – 2011), a most valuable contribution. Extensive knowledge of the work of Tesla and other aspects of new energy. Resides and works in California and Japan.
10) Simon Clifford, has done extenive voluntary work on behalf of AIAS, including the construction of new energy circuits and voluntary help in the early essay broadcasts. Graduate of Durham, has worked for the Ministry of Defence and Malvern Instruments. Able electronics engineer with extensive knowledge of the subject.
==============

Entry  posted November 4, 2012 at 7:45 am

AIAS / Principia Cooperation

This is just what is needed, and many thanks. AIAS is also affiliated with Cambridge International Science Publishing (www.cisp-publishing.com , CISP) and I am pleased to mention its recent relevant publications as follows. These give the basic background and it would be very helpful if they were given publicity and are all recent CISP publications. They would make ideal course books where appropriate.

1) M. W. Evans, Ed., Journal of Foundations of Physics and Chemistry, ISSN 2046 9888, six issues a year from June 2011 (www.cisp-publishing.com, CISP).
2) M. W. Evans, Ed. “Definitive Refutations of the Einsteinian General Relativity”, softback and e book ISBN-13: 978-1-907343-08-7, 200 pp., 22 pounds stirling; hardback ISBN 978-1-907343-38-4, forty pounds stirling.
3) M. W. Evans, S. J. Crothers, H. Eckardt and K. Pendergast, “Criticisms of the Einstein Field Equation”, large format hardback, ISBN 978-1-907343-28-5, 480 pp, 95 pounds stirling.
4) Kerry Pendergast, “The Life of Myron Evans”, ISBN 978-1-907343-40-7, 300 pp., 50 pounds stirling.
5) Myron Wyn Evans, “O Wraidd ei Ddoe” (first volume of autobiography), published in 2012 in association with Authors Online, 15.99 pounds stirling, 281 pp, ISBN 978-0-7552-0700-8, available in hardback and multi e format from www.authorsonline.co.uk .

There are currently 229 source UFT papers, many of which have been published in the journal (attached list). The source UFT papers have split physics into two: ECE unified physics and the incorrect and obsolete standard model of physics now coming under heavy criticism from all quarters. Over about a decade the UFT papers have generated about twenty million hits.

These books are also available from all good book shops.

In a message dated 04/11/2012 00:21:30 GMT Standard Time, writes:

Joe,
Glad to have you take on this special responsibility. I see the arrival of Prof Evans and his associates as the signal for us to kick start PSI on a new branch of work unrelated to climate science.As one of the original founder members of PSI I know you’ve been keen from the outset to see us do far more in the realms of cutting edge science, so I’m confident you will give this project your fullest commitment. In this I know you won’t let the side down. The best way to begin is to become thoroughly familiar with the work of Evans and his colleagues at AIAS. You will have enormous responsibility but can gain the prestige of ensuring PSI establishes legitimacy as a publisher of non-climate science papers.

Feel free to involve, as you see fit, those team members you believe can help PSI most working with Prof Evans and his colleagues e.g. Bob Ashworth and Oliver Manuel.

In the first instance, please familiarize yourself with the work of Prof Evans, the Alpha Foundation’s Institute for Advanced Study (AIAS) and the The Unified Physics Institute of Technology (UPITEC). You may even want to begin with an introductory PSI article to explain to readers what the unified model of physics means. Remember, many of our readers are lay people, not just scientists, so your work needs to have the broadest appeal.

Like me, I’m sure you will see this as a great opportunity to grow PSI’s understanding about research into a unified model of physics and the new science and technology that becomes available with such insights.
Many thanks!
John

http://www.slayingtheskydragon.com
===============

Entry posted November 4, 2012 at 7:07 am



The Non Existent Higgs Boson

It would go a long way in cement our ties with Prof Evans and his colleagues if we could put together some kind of positive PSI summary of his groundbreaking work. It is beyond me being a non-scientist to do any such write up but as someone on the PSI team who has always been immersed in studying Einstein’s work it may be right up your street.

Many thanks,

John

This is excellent work. The flaw in GWS theory is pointed out in UFT225.
In a message dated 03/11/2012 23:18:08 GMT Standard Time, writes:
Myron
others currently on the Slayer team with paradigm shifting research include Bob Ashworth, Chem E with his “Confirmation of the Helical Travel of Light”, peer reviewed and published in Physics Letters….
and Joe Postma, MSc Astronomy with his newest “Absence of a Measurable Greenhouse Effect”, peer reviewed and published by PSI….we look forward to joining forces and creating a new emperaical paradigm….
Joe 0
Subject: Re: Only 14% of heat transfer from surface can be affected.
This would be most helpful, and many thanks.
In a message dated 03/11/2012 11:44:54 GMT Standard Time, john0sullivan@btinternet.com writes:
Joe,
http://www.slayingtheskydragon.com

===============

Entry posted November 3, 2012 at 6:32 pm

Glad to work with Timothy Ball


I would be glad to work with Timothy Ball, from whom I can learn a lot about climate science. I am keen to begin legal proceedings against turbine developers who have ruined our beautiful countryside here in Wales. So I am most grateful for the help and interest of John O’Sullivan and Principia. My arguments in theoretical physics are very well known worldwide (feedback to www.aias.us).

In a message dated 03/11/2012 17:21:43 GMT Standard Time, writes:

Tim,
Lovely article. I’m passing this to Hans to add to our PSI website, when his time permits. As you are Chair of PSI I would cordially invite you to open lines of communication with our newest member, Myron Evans, Founder and Director of the Alpha Foundation’s Institute for Advanced Study (AIAS) and of the Unified Physics Institute of Technology (UPITEC). Myron and I see great potential for cooperation between us. I am eager to visit with him in Wales later this month to strategize further in common cause. Just like us, Myron has faced resistance to his innovative work.
In addition, I will be assisting Myron and his fellow anti-windfarm campaigners in mounting a legal challenge against wind farms in local Welsh communities. Your vast knowledge of such falsities in climate science will prove useful to such legal arguments. We are all keenly aware that it is trumped up global warming alarmism that underpins all the “renewables” boondoggles, so working together we can better achieve our goals.
Many thanks,
John
http://www.slayingtheskydragon.com
===========

Entry posted November 3, 2012 at 9:41 am



Refutations of the Higgs Boson and Einsteinian General Relativity



I first refuted the Higgs boson theory in about November 1991 at the Cornell Theory Center, in papers published in Physica B on thewww.aias.us Omnia Opera section. This was by inference of the B(3) field, which split physics entirely into what has become ECE and standard model. This is as deep a split as Copenhagen versus causal realist. The B(3) field refutes conclusively the U(1) sector symmetry of the Higgs theory, and since then I have refuted U(1) in about four hundred papers and books, avidly read worldwide offwww.aias.us. The unique feedback data bank I have built up shows this beyond any doubt. So attempts to ignore ECE cannot but fail. I demonstrated several basic error in the GWS theory in UFT225 onwww.aias.us (to be published in J. Found. Phys. Chem, www.cisp-publishing.com). The CERN experiment is carefully contrived to claim the existence of an idea proven wrong not only by myself but by many others for many years. There are over twenty adjustable parameters in the theory, which is obviously meaningless on these grounds alone. The CERN Director was carefully groomed for a CBE, and Higgs, whose own output is very low, (miniscule compared with mine, and in my opinion of no significance), is being carefully groomed for a Big N. We are told that it is not premature to award a Nobel Prize for something that does not exist. Higgs was sent a letter of congratulations from Cameron, whose knowledge of physics is worse than his knowledge of economics, which by popular acclaim, is zero, the Scrooge of the Century. I have pointed out all my refutations in a letter addressed to David Cameron, but despite (or perhaps because of) my being a Civil List scientist appointed by Tony Blair, my letter was intercepted and sent to – you guessed it – CERN. So I was told that they are right by knee jerk and that I must accept the fact that they are right, otherwise their funds might be cut. Unfortunately I have always been left and replied, whereupon I was sent a postcard by the unknown bureaucrat. In the same way Al Gore and a Committee were groomed for another Big N for what is scientifically a wildly erroneous fantasy that has caused immense economic harm. Even Cameron is beginning to feel the heat, which is criticism, not global warming. He is a multi millionaire, and may just possibly have an interest in wind turbines. Now he has been pulled back by his own tories, so a purge of the cabinet has ensued. The only ones left are far right – they may fall off the table. Similarly, many others and I have refuted the Einsteinian general relativity in many ways for many years, some of which are very easy to understand. Essays on this topic are very popular, broadcast by Robert Cheshire on www.aias.us. All this mediaeval fantasy is due to a lack of basic scholarship, the unwillingness to put in the hours of hard work, or for an athlete, the hours of hard training. The result is a fat and flabby mess.

In a message dated 02/11/2012 09:51:02 GMT Standard Time, writes:
Hi Doug,

Agreed. Now that Prof Claes Johnson and Joe Postma affirm your analysis on this I will certainly pass it among select others in the team so that they can add any comments as they see fit. Among those added here are two of our newest members, Lionell Griffith and Nobel Science Prize nominee, Prof Myron Evans ( see Einstein–Cartan–Evans theory) . As we have now affiliated with the Unified Physics Institute of Technology (UPITEC) and the Alpha Institute for Advanced Studies we will be inviting members of those associations to assist on such matters as we work together with them in a spirit of mutual cooperation and advancement of our shared goals to promote new scientific ideas.

Many thanks,
John

http://www.slayingtheskydragon.com


============== 

Entry posted November 3, 2012 at 6:58 am

Biographies of AIAS Fellows

Their biographies are all online in “Marquis Who’s Who”, but unfortunately there is a small subscription to enter the Marquis site. Marquis is the world’s leading reference vehicle, founded in Chicago, 1899. Briefly and from memory the bio’s are as follows, they can be checked for detail by looking up Marquis online. I will soon propose the other AIAS Fellows with short bio’s.

1) Dr Horst Eckardt is President of UPITEC and a graduate of Clausthal University, doing his doctorate in computational quantum mechanics with application to solids. He works in Munich for the Siemens Company and has greatly contributed to ECE theory, being a co author of many papers.
2) Sean Mac Lachlan works for Hewlett Packard in Boise Idaho, and was the second webmaster of www.aias.us. He owns www.atomicprecision.com and www.upitec.org, and is Secretary of UPITEC, a not for profit organization registered in Boise, Idaho.
3) Dr. Doug Lindstrom graduated from the University of British Columbia and worked for the Alberta Research Council. He has contributed greatly to ECE theory, notably introducing the Lindstrom antisymmetry constraint.
4) Prof. Jose Croca heads a well known research group in the University of Lisbon that has refuted the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle in many careful experiments. He is a prominent intellectual of the causal realist school of Einstein and de Broglie.
5) Kerry Pendergast is a Royal Society Hauksbee Medallist, and graduated M. Sc. in Prof. Sir John Meurig Thomas’ group at the Edward Davies Chemical Laboratories, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth. He was a pioneer of electron microscopy of single atoms, and was a prominent and very successful teacher in Gwent, before retiring to become a writer and author. He resides in Blaina and Aberystwyth, and is my biographer, “The Life of Myron Evans” (Cambridge International Science Publishing, www.cisp-publishing.com.)
6) Prof. Corneliu Ciubotariu is a prominent general relativist from Romania who devised the general metric for the Evans Vigier field, or B(3) field for which I am told I was nominated for a Nobel Prize. These things are supposed to be confidential, but I have no reason to doubt that I have been nominated.
7) Ray Delaforce is a prominent engineer who resides in the United States. He was the first to discover the petal orbits of ECE theory as described in recent UFT papers on www.aias.us.
8) Prof. Bo Lehnert is a King of Sweden Gold Medallist, and Member of the Royal Swedish Academy. He was a student of the Nobel Laureate Hannes Alfven in Stockholm University, and independently inferred a B(3) type field that overturns the standard model dogma.
9) Nils Abramson is retired from a full professorship at Stockholm University, and is notable for his contributions to optics.
10) Prof. Bill Coffey is Professor and Fellow of Trinity College Dublin, author of many papers and books on Brownian motion. He was a co author of mine in several books and papers.
11) Prof. Jo Moscicki is Professor in the Jagiellonian University in Krakow, and sometime scientist at the EDCL in Aberystwyth. He divides his time between Krakow and Cornell University.
12) Dr Liuda Pozhar is a prominent scientist of the liquid state, who has worked in Kharkov and Cornell University. Presently she works in Britain as a senior lecturer or reader I believe. This can be checked with Marquis online.
13) Prof Sisir Roy is Professor in the Indian Statistical Institute in Calcutta. He worked on the B(3) type field with Bo Lehnert.
14) Also, Victor Riecansky, publisher of Cambridge International Science Publishing (www.cisp-publishing.com) is an AIAS Fellow and has been included in Marquis recently. I am sure he would like to join Principia, as would the other AIAS Fellows, whose bio’s I will send over shortly. I am sure they will correct me if I get a detail wrong.

In a message dated 02/11/2012 15:33:04 GMT Standard Time writes:

Myron.
Thanks for that. I will be aiming to have our webmaster upload to our PSI site a revised and updated list of members and would like to add short bios for the 14 fellows from AIAS. Do you have to hand anything I can use in that regard? I believe they are as follows:...
2) Horst Eckardt, AIAS Deputy Director, President of UPITEC....
3) Sean MacLachlan, AIAS Fellow, Secretary of UPITEC....
4) Douglas Willard Lindstrom, AIAS Fellow....
5) Jose Ramhalo Croca, AIAS Fellow....
6) Kerry Richard Pendergast, AIAS Fellow....
7) Corneliu Ciubotariu, AIAS Fellow....
8) Raymond W. J. Delaforce, AIAS Fellow....
9) Bo Peter Lehnert, AIAS Fellow, B(3) type theory....
10) Nils Hugo Abramson, AIAS Fellow....
11) William Thomas Coffey, AIAS Fellow, B(3) type theory....
12) Jozef Kazimierz Moscicki, AIAS Fellow....
13) Liudmila Antonovna Pozhar, AIAS Fellow....
14) Sisir Roy, AIAS Fellow, B(3) type theory.

Many thanks,
John
http://www.slayingtheskydragon.com
============

Entry posted November 2, 2012 at 10:27 am

FOR POSTING: Updated CV

I have updated my CV to mention the honour of appointment to Principia and I ask Dave Burleigh to post this updated CV summary in the appropriate place in www.aias.us. Many thanks in anticipation.

In a message dated 29/10/2012 12:36:46 GMT Standard Time, writes:

Dear Professor Evans,
This is excellent news. Welcome to the Principia Scientific International (PSI) team! I can confirm that my organization would be most happy to be of immediate assistance to you and your AIAS Fellows in your related endeavours. The legal avenue you propose looks like it may prove fruitful and I will garner more from material on your site at www.aias.us. I’m sure my colleagues will be just as intrigued as me to study this further. On the science side of the battle please allow me to introduce to you and your colleagues a welcome new development.
....
PSI has now published our definitive refutation of the so-called greenhouse gas theory, the basis of all scientific claims for reducing CO2 emissions that foists on us tax-hungry and ill-thought out “renewable” boondoggles. The paper is fresh off the press and we will be eagerly promoting it and inviting further critical evaluation throughout the scientific community (not just among a self-serving clique of climatologists). Several experts in thermodynamics have peer-reviewed the work and affirm that it proves in great detail that the calculations used by government climatologists to advocate restrictions of CO2 emissions are based on misinterpretations of data and scientific laws (see Page 51 of the document for the short summary). Our chair, Dr Tim Ball is currently engaged, as are other team members, in private discussions with leading climatologists, Dr. Richard Lindzen and Dr. Roy Spencer, on the implications of this new paper.
....
The paper may be found online at:
....
It will be my great pleasure to announce on our website your addition to the team. Unless I hear from you otherwise, I will take the liberty of adding a short bio for you on our select members page. For sure there is much we can achieve together that would never be accomplished separately. As such, we certainly welcome further new members by your recommendation herein and we relish the opportunity to forge productive ties with AIAS. Certainly all on your c.c list are cordially invited to apply to join. An email directly to me or via our website will suffice. For more information about us please visit the ‘Policies’ and ‘About’ sections at our website. I will email again in due course to agree a mutually convenient time and date for our phone discussion/meeting. I am also taking the liberty of adding to your c.c. list selected email addresses of some of my senior colleagues so as to facilitate further dialogue among us.
...
Truly,
John O’Sullivan LLB, BA Hon. PGCE
Coordinator, Principia Scientific International
http://principia-scientific.org/
..., NR31 9UN
Tel:0787.....
=============

Entry posted November 2, 2012 at 8:20 am

Article by John O’Sullivan

Many thanks again! This is a photograph taken at Craig y Nos Castle in 2008 during some filming there of “The 
Universe of Myron Evans”, which is now on the net.

In a message dated 01/11/2012 20:04:04 GMT Standard Time, writes:

Myron,
I’ve gone ahead and posted the news announcement I sent you yesterday. See here
http://principia-scientific.org/index.php/latest-news/
Please let me know if there any corrections you feel are necessary. Also, we would like to add a photo of your good self to accompany that of Tim Ball. I’ve checked Google images and there are a few there but very small. If it’s no trouble to you and you have one to hand, would you please forward me a photo that you feel is suitable?
Thanks
John
http://www.slayingtheskydragon.com
=================== 

Entry posted November 2, 2012 at 8:11 am



Legal Measures against Turbines


This is very helpful as usual. In view of the compliance initiative, violation of the European Convention on Human Rights has become a solid basis for filing an injunction against the Betws development based on a detailed development of the attached statement of claim. The statute of limitations is no longer a problem. Betws violates human rights, conservation laws, environmental laws and is a direct assault on democracy, in that a very large majority against of written objections was ignored. So under Section 41 of the Commons Act of 2006 an injunction can be filed to seek its demolition, and similarly for the demolition of all turbines sites forced through against a large local opposition. Section 41 states that illegal works on commonland can be demolished by court order. The Welsh ministers are overruled by compliance under the Aarhus Accord. If Betws is demolished or stopped it would set a precedent for a moratorium on all mainland turbine development. Turbines are known to be useless so their demolition would leave the way for a stable, gas fired, grid across Europe. Section 38 of the 2006 Commons Act forbids all works on commonland without ministerial consent. Ministerial consent can no longer be given against a very large local majority against, because that would be a violation of human rights under the Aarhus Accord. The European human rights court has been made more accessible under the Swords initiative. It used to be that all legal processes inside a member state had to be exhausted before a filing could be made in the European court. That of course is prohibitively expensive for all but the very wealthy. So an injunction can be sought to prevent Mynydd y Gwair under Section 38 of the 2006 Commons Act. In plain language no one wants our landscape to be obliterated so that the Duke of Beaufort can get even richer. Swansea Council recently had to pay him 270,000 pounds for ancient fishing rights that were suddenly discovered when a bridge was built across the Tawe. The Council meekly caved in, but should have fought him to the European court.


In a message dated 01/11/2012 18:19:33 GMT Standard Time, writes:
Mark,
Many thanks! I’ve added them to my records. Had a great phone chat with Prof Evans and we will work together on strategy. There is much detail for me to get my teeth into so will put together a document to brief legal counsel. I can see I will need to acquire the services of a welsh barrister to work pro bono. Will check my contacts to see if we can find someone. Will be in touch soon.

Best
John

http://www.slayingtheskydragon.com

===================

Entry posted November 1, 2012 at 8:15 am 

Call for Local Referenda on Wind Turbines


Croeso i bawb, welcome to all! In view of the strength of feeling against turbines on Mynydd y Gwair and Betws I call for a local referendum and demand that the Welsh Ministers do not over rule a 95% opposition. I call for a halt to the Betws development and an immediate enquiry into irregularites. I urge Swansea Councils to throw out Mynydd y Gwair on the grounds of the Swords initiative across Europe and on the grounds of the Hemsby precedent in High Court. Any party that betrays the unanimous voice of the People is destined for oblivion.
In a message dated 31/10/2012 14:16:10 GMT Standard Time, writes:
Mark,
Yes, please do feed us all such information. I see the initiative Professor Evans is leading in Wales as a great vehicle for us in that there is such passion in the local community. Having lived and worked in the Port Talbot and Swansea areas I have seen far more placards protesting wind farms in Wales than I’ve anywhere in my travels around the UK. Wales is especially being blighted by these monstrosities as central govt has seen it as a soft touch in such matters.Many thanks,John
http://www.slayingtheskydragon.com
==================

Entry posted November 1, 2012 at 8:08 am

Coordinating anti Turbine Groups in Wales

This would be very important in my opinion, and glad to make the acquaintance of Pat Swords. I feel that all turbine development in Wales should be halted.

In a message dated 31/10/2012 13:05:59 GMT Standard Time, writes:

John,

Thank you for telling me of your plan. I congratulate you and welcome this initiative.
If I can be of help in contacting other Welsh groups that are not part of your list,
and perhaps convince some to join, I will gladly oblige.

Best regards

Mark

Mark Duchamp +34 693 643 736
Executive Director, EPAW
www.epaw.org
President, Save the Eagles International
www.savetheeaglesinternational.org
Chairman, World Council for Nature
www.wcfn.org

On 31 October 2012 11:53, JOHN OSULLIVAN wrote:

Mark,
Thank you for your timely contribution to this thread. I salute your commendable and productive efforts to date. EPAW’s initiative with Pat Swords in seeking to compel an Internal Review of the EU’s energy plan seems the best way forward on a national scale.

With the strength of feeling in South Wales on this issue it looks to me as if we can readily form a very broad consensus group to progress matters here. Indeed, it is now incumbent upon Swansea City and County Councils, Neath Port Talbot Borough Council and others to meet with us so we can draw up a mutually agreeable plan of action. In that way the legal costs, in full or in part, may be mitigated.

I believe local authorities will now see they have a golden opportunity to show leadership in this respect being that the EU, via UNECE, has already conceded the illegality of wind farm development as per their admitted breach of the Aarhus Convention. As such all local authorities, as per the due diligence requirement, must now ascertain for themselves their own immediate legal responsibilities.

At minimum, and at no cost to itself, Swansea City Council and County Councils could ameliorate local concern by making a press announcement that it recognizes the gravity of this issue and that it will undertake to meet with representatives of all sides to consider a plan of action. That will send a signal to the UK national government. To my mind, everyone has a stake here in seeing that this issue is now raised in Parliament before we all incur unnecessary and avoidable legal expense and further waste of resources. Clearly, it is for central government to sort out the legal mess it has fostered, not regional and local authorities or grassroots communities and advocates.

As such, there is a golden opportunity for all the aforementioned authorities and interest groups to unite with us and lobby at ministerial level. It is a win-win situation for all on this thread and I urge everyone to recognize this as the obvious and most expedient approach.

For my part, I have committed myself to assist Professor Evans. If anyone on this list is interested in meeting personally at a venue to be agreed in the Swansea area for direct consultation, I’m available for any mutually agreeable date in the latter half of November.
Truly,

John O’Sullivan LLB, BA Hon. PGCE
...., NR31 9UN
Tel: 0787 ... ....

Coordinator, Principia Scientific International
======================== 

Entry posted November 1, 2012 at 8:03 am



Legal Challenge to Turbines in Europe




Executive Director, EPAW


President, Save the Eagles International


Chairman, World Council for Nature


Many thanks for your draft. I have given it careful review.

<!–[if

!supportEmptyParas]–> <!–[endif]–>

As such, it is a requirement under the Convention that the EU must apply those principles as adopted at the 1992 Earth Summit held in Rio de Janeiro. In a nutshell all EU States must properly reassess their National Renewable Energy Action Plans (NREAP).

<!–[if

!supportEmptyParas]–> <!–[endif]–>

Pat Swords, author of the successful complaint to the UN that the EU now agrees it must apply, advises: “the Compliance Committee has shown that the EU’s renewable energy programme is proceeding without ‘proper authority’.” Currently, the EU has about 60,000 wind turbines and related infrastructure, which have cost some €180 billion.

<!–[if

!supportEmptyParas]–> <!–[endif]–>

I concur with Pat Swords that the EU and its 27 Member States must be suspend all further wind farm development until the conclusion of consultation as stipulated in the ruling. I have advised the Devon community I’m assisting in this matter and they are instructing their legal counsel accordingly. Among PSI there are only two of us qualified in law, myself and Alberto Miatello in Italy. I’m adding Alberto’s email for convenience so he may make use of all such evidence as he sees fit in his home country.

Best,

John

Good to hear from Mark Duchamp, with whom I have been corresponding for some years during a fifteen year battle against Betws and Mynydd y Gwair. The full horrors of the Betws development are apparent to the apathetic. There is no significant global warming, it is not caused by carbon dioxide, and the Westminster Government has just done a delta function U turn, switching to gas fired power stations. So I call for a moratorium on wind turbine construction and a local referendum on Mynydd y Gwair and Betws, with powers of demolition. Compensation to the order of billions for environmental damage can be sought from the wind turbine companies.
In a message dated 31/10/2012 03:20:28 GMT Standard Time, writes:
Dear all,
It is also useful to know that EPAW – www.epaw.org – with the help of Pat Swords, has lodged a complaint to the European Ombudsman, a petition to the EU Parliament, and recently requested an Internal Review of the EU’s energy plan:
Here is what Pat Swords said about it:
“At an EU level if one was to take legal action against the Directive, then one could put the brakes on the whole 27 Member States.
“… the EU has not complied with its obligations under Aarhus and has made it well nigh impossible for a citizen / citizen group to go after it in the European Court. Generally speaking one would have to go through the national legal routes first. This lack of justice is being challenged by others at the moment. There is also a mechanism under the EU’s Aarhus Regulation (1367/2006), in which (with quite a bit of difficulty) one can go direct into the European Court to challenge the EU Institution directly.
“At the moment this route is being developed, if you see No. 13 below in respect of EPAW’s request for Internal Review:
“This might well in the short to medium period open up an opportunity for EPAW to go in and challenge in the European Court, which is not a complex or expensive Court, just one which is very difficult to get into.”
unquote
When the European Commission rules out the requested Internal Review, an opportunity will appear for a recourse to the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg. EPAW doesn’t have the financial means to hire a lawyer (we have no means, period), so it will be a waste of a unique opportunity to deliver a serious blow to the energy plans of the 27 EU countries.
I am copying Pat Swords into this email.
Best wishes
Mark
Mark Duchamp +34 693 643 736
On 30 October 2012 09:21, wrote:
Many thanks indeed, this is indeed useful information. It is clear that the Swansea County Councils must consult legal advice on this point and throw out Mynydd y Gwair immediately. If the Welsh Ministers attempt to catalyse a crisis of democracy, become loathsome tyrants, and ignore a 95% opposition, they are acting illegally in my opinion on the grounds of UNECE. Betws was driven through against very weak opposition. Monstrous trubines are being built on some of the most beautiful and precious landscape in the whole of Europe. Betws violated many human rights, conservation laws, environmental laws, and ignored an 85% written objection majority. The opposition to Mynydd y Gwair consists of twenty groups, and is polled at 95%. It includes Swansea City and COunty COuncils, and Neath Port TAlbot Borough Council, town councils, community councils, CADW of the Welsh Government, environmental groups, conservationists and many others. What is needed now is the organization of a fund to cover legal costs of filing an injunction against Betws and a national fund to fight wind turbines through the courts. Perhaps a steering committee can be organized and a treasurer elected.
In a message dated 29/10/2012 18:06:44 GMT Standard Time, writes:
Professor Evans,
I note that you have not included in your legal argument any reference to the astonishing new ruling by the Compliance Committee of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). Perhaps you’ve not been advised of it yet. I strongly urge that you amend your proposed statement of claim to include reference to this potential game changing decision made last Summer. In it UNECE decided it was incumbent on all member EU states to enforce the Aarhus Convention. This gives additional weight to your human rights arguments and need for governments to apply due process (which they patently haven’t!).
I hope that helps.
www.slayingtheskydragon.com
================== 

Entry posted November 1, 2012 at 7:41 am

Cooperation between Principia and AIAS

Many thanks for these kind remarks. As you see I am posting all these mailings on the www.aias.us blog, which reaches one hundred and forty three countries.

In a message dated 30/10/2012 12:43:30 GMT Standard Time, writes:

Joe,
I see you are very taken by the work Professor Evans. I agree, it quite simply “blows your socks” off. Professor Evans invites us to use any material on www.aias.us that may help the cause for both PSI and AIAS. In line with our groundbreaking new paper by Joe Postma debunking the GHE (link below) we have a fantastic opportunity to perform mutually beneficial work to ensure that the findings of Postma and Evans reach the widest possible audience. Let’s all work together to unseat the discredit science elite that has actively sought to be gatekeepers to such advances.
I have no doubt that Professor Evans and his many colleagues at AIAS will reciprocate as we all care deeply about truth and integrity in science. It is important that we spread the word: http://principia-scientific.org/publications/Absence_Measureable_Greenhouse_Effect.pdf

Many thanks,
John

http://www.slayingtheskydragon.com
============

Entry posted November 1, 2012 at 7:41 am

Legal Challenge to Betws and Mynydd y Gwair

Many thanks indeed,you are welcome here any time. This is a great help those who see Betws being destroyed before their eyes. As you know the word comes from the Latin “beatus”, which means “blessed”, and was a significant site of the early Celtic or insular Christianity which reached its highest peak of civilization with the Book of Kells, Leabhar Cheanannais. Thanks also for your kind comments on my blog. It is very interesting to see that a Nobel Prize claim for global warming has been withdrawn. Those intellectuals of up to two thousand years ago would have recognized the face of barbarism. Among them was my distant ancestor, Dewi Sant, St. David, who was also descended from Prince Brychan (or Bruachan) Brycheinog.

In a message dated 30/10/2012 10:51:03 GMT Standard Time, writes:

I would like to be involved further in this to help set up a legal challenge to compel Swansea City Council to throw out Mynydd y Gwair. Because we now have this new EU ruling upholding the UN’s Aarhuus Convection requirements on public consultation, we have compelling ammunition to mount such a legal challenge to prevail upon Welsh Ministers, Swansea City Council and County Councils as well as Neath Port Talbot Borough Council in the courts. We can demonstrate unequivocally that Betws not only violated many human rights but were facilitated in that by equally unlawful conduct by UK and Welsh government authorities. I will make it a priority to visit with you in person to discuss plans for this.

John O’Sullivan LLB, BA Hon. PGCE
Coordinator, Principia Scientific International
http://principia-scientific.org/
...., NR31 9UN

Sent: Tuesday, 30 October 2012, 8:21
Subject: Compliance Committee of the United Nations: Betws and Mynydd y Gwair are Illegal

Many thanks indeed, this is indeed useful information. It is clear that the Swansea County Councils must consult legal advice on this point and throw out Mynydd y Gwair immediately. If the Welsh Ministers attempt to catalyse a crisis of democracy, become loathsome tyrants, and ignore a 95% opposition, they are acting illegally in my opinion on the grounds of UNECE. Betws was driven through against very weak opposition. Monstrous trubines are being built on some of the most beautiful and precious landscape in the whole of Europe. Betws violated many human rights, conservation laws, environmental laws, and ignored an 85% written objection majority. The opposition to Mynydd y Gwair consists of twenty groups, and is polled at 95%. It includes Swansea City and COunty COuncils, and Neath Port TAlbot Borough Council, town councils, community councils, CADW of the Welsh Government, environmental groups, conservationists and many others. What is needed now is the organization of a fund to cover legal costs of filing an injunction against Betws and a national fund to fight wind turbines through the courts. Perhaps a steering committee can be organized and a treasurer elected.

In a message dated 29/10/2012 18:06:44 GMT Standard Time, writes:

Professor Evans,
Many thanks for your draft. I have given it careful review.

I note that you have not included in your legal argument any reference to the astonishing new ruling by the Compliance Committee of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). Perhaps you’ve not been advised of it yet. I strongly urge that you amend your proposed statement of claim to include reference to this potential game changing decision made last Summer. In it UNECE decided it was incumbent on all member EU states to enforce the Aarhus Convention. This gives additional weight to your human rights arguments and need for governments to apply due process (which they patently haven’t!).
...
As such, it is a requirement under the Convention that the EU must apply those principles as adopted at the 1992 Earth Summit held in Rio de Janeiro. In a nutshell all EU States must properly reassess their National Renewable Energy Action Plans (NREAP).
...
Pat Swords, author of the successful complaint to the UN that the EU now agrees it must apply, advises: “the Compliance Committee has shown that the EU’s renewable energy programme is proceeding without ‘proper authority’.” Currently, the EU has about 60,000 wind turbines and related infrastructure, which have cost some €180 billion.
...
I concur with Pat Swords that the EU and its 27 Member States must be suspend all further wind farm development until the conclusion of consultation as stipulated in the ruling. I have advised the Devon community I’m assisting in this matter and they are instructing their legal counsel accordingly. Among PSI there are only two of us qualified in law, myself and Alberto Miatello in Italy. I’m adding Alberto’s email for convenience so he may make use of all such evidence as he sees fit in his home country.

I hope that helps.
Best,
John
================= 

This entry was posted on October 30, 2012 at 9:11 am

FOR POSTING : “Against Global Warming”, a new essay by Robert Cheshire.

This is a brilliant new essay by Robert Cheshire and I am forwarding it to Dave Burleigh for posting in the essay section of www.aias.us and simultaneously posting it on the blog. It inverts “Dogma” to give “Amgod”, a suitable summary of some of those among us who walk on immense pylons and flail their arms like the demented. Also forwarding to the entire Principia group.

In a message dated 29/10/2012 18:06:44 GMT Standard Time, writes:

Professor Evans,
Many thanks for your draft. I have given it careful review.

I note that you have not included in your legal argument any reference to the astonishing new ruling by the Compliance Committee of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). Perhaps you’ve not been advised of it yet. I strongly urge that you amend your proposed statement of claim to include reference to this potential game changing decision made last Summer. In it UNECE decided it was incumbent on all member EU states to enforce the Aarhus Convention. This gives additional weight to your human rights arguments and need for governments to apply due process (which they patently haven’t!).
....
As such, it is a requirement under the Convention that the EU must apply those principles as adopted at the 1992 Earth Summit held in Rio de Janeiro. In a nutshell all EU States must properly reassess their National Renewable Energy Action Plans (NREAP).
....
Pat Swords, author of the successful complaint to the UN that the EU now agrees it must apply, advises: “the Compliance Committee has shown that the EU’s renewable energy programme is proceeding without ‘proper authority’.” Currently, the EU has about 60,000 wind turbines and related infrastructure, which have cost some €180 billion.
....
I concur with Pat Swords that the EU and its 27 Member States must be suspend all further wind farm development until the conclusion of consultation as stipulated in the ruling. I have advised the Devon community I’m assisting in this matter and they are instructing their legal counsel accordingly. Among PSI there are only two of us qualified in law, myself and Alberto Miatello in Italy. I’m adding Alberto’s email for convenience so he may make use of all such evidence as he sees fit in his home country.

I hope that helps.
Best,
John
============ 

Entry posted October 29, 2012 at 4:37 pm

Principia Scientific International

It is a pleasure to meet your colleagues. I attach a list of AIAS Fellows and others in “Marquis Who’s Who”. The AIAS Fellows are numbers one to fourteen. The other AIAS Fellows here are also well known. The others on my mailing list are not all scientists, but may be interested in joining if your rules allow. SOCME for example is the organization that fights the Mynydd y Gwair proposal, and Sia^n Ifan and Gethin ap Gruffudd are from Llys Genhedlaeth (Embassy) Owain Glyndw^r. They have been very active in fighting the Betws development, and in general do great work throughout Wales. The others here are not scientists, so probably cannot join. I think that the safest thing is to begin by adding the fourteen AIAS Fellows listed in Marquis. Others may like to join later. The ECE websites are currently generating 1.7 million hits a year. Since April 30th 2004 I have filtered out the visits from the sector I call universities, institutes and similar, and that is attached, showing unprecedented interest in ECE and by implication, rejection of the standard model of physics. I feel that there is a need to establish an anti turbine majority in Europe as soon as possible, one that would try to implement Section 41 of the 2006 Commonland Act in Britain and aim to demolish illegal turbine sites, or those forced through against large opposing local majorities. It would also seek to prevent more turbine developments using Section 38.

In a message dated 29/10/2012 12:36:46 GMT Standard Time, writes:

Dear Professor Evans,
This is excellent news. Welcome to the Principia Scientific International (PSI) team! I can confirm that my organization would be most happy to be of immediate assistance to you and your AIAS Fellows in your related endeavours. The legal avenue you propose looks like it may prove fruitful and I will garner more from material on your site at www.aias.us. I’m sure my colleagues will be just as intrigued as me to study this further. On the science side of the battle please allow me to introduce to you and your colleagues a welcome new development.
...
PSI has now published our definitive refutation of the so-called greenhouse gas theory, the basis of all scientific claims for reducing CO2 emissions that foists on us tax-hungry and ill-thought out “renewable” boondoggles. The paper is fresh off the press and we will be eagerly promoting it and inviting further critical evaluation throughout the scientific community (not just among a self-serving clique of climatologists). Several experts in thermodynamics have peer-reviewed the work and affirm that it proves in great detail that the calculations used by government climatologists to advocate restrictions of CO2 emissions are based on misinterpretations of data and scientific laws (see Page 51 of the document for the short summary). Our chair, Dr Tim Ball is currently engaged, as are other team members, in private discussions with leading climatologists, Dr. Richard Lindzen and Dr. Roy Spencer, on the implications of this new paper.
...
The paper may be found online at:
http://principia-scientific.org/publications/Absence_Measureable_Greenhouse_Effect.pdf
...
It will be my great pleasure to announce on our website your addition to the team. Unless I hear from you otherwise, I will take the liberty of adding a short bio for you on our select members page. For sure there is much we can achieve together that would never be accomplished separately. As such, we certainly welcome further new members by your recommendation herein and we relish the opportunity to forge productive ties with AIAS. Certainly all on your c.c list are cordially invited to apply to join. An email directly to me or via our website will suffice. For more information about us please visit the ‘Policies’ and ‘About’ sections at our website. I will email again in due course to agree a mutually convenient time and date for our phone discussion/meeting. I am also taking the liberty of adding to your c.c. list selected email addresses of some of my senior colleagues so as to facilitate further dialogue among us.
...
Truly,
John O’Sullivan LLB, BA Hon. PGCE
Coordinator, Principia Scientific International
http://principia-scientific.org/
...., NR31 9UN
Tel:0787....
==============

Entry posted October 29, 2012 at 6:58 am

Principia Scientific International

This is a very interesting development, I will be pleased to accept your kind offer and join Principia Scientific International – much appreciated. If there is mutual interest I can also recommend one or two AIAS Fellows. I will be pleased to meet or phone at your convenience. We are in the process of organizing a meeting here at home in Craig Cefn Parc or in Aberystwyth on the new low energy nuclear reactors, which are a promising source of energy, and also the Alex Hill spacetime devices (www.et3m.net, www.upitec.org, www.atomicprecision.com). I am also interested in applying for an injunction in Court to have the Betws wind turbine development demolished under Section 41 of the 2006 Commonland Act, on the grounds that it violates human rights and numerous other grounds. Section 41 asserts that illegal works on commonland must be demolished. I cannot do this alone however, because I am not entitled to legal aid. I discussed this with Alex Lord Carlisle Q. C. at the House of Lords and he advised that my proposal was ingenious. As you may know he is the leader of a national anti wind turbine platform in the Lords. However he thinks it would be a tough legal fight and his fees are of course prohibitive. He thinks that the government might try to enact new legislation to prevent demolition, but the government cannot defy the law. If it were won however it would lead to a precedent for court orders to demolish wind turbines. Similarly the Mynydd y Gwair proposal is opposed furiously by 95% of the local electorate, and in that case an injunction to prohibit the development taken out under Section 38 of the 2006 Act, which prohibits all works on commonland without ministerial consent as you know. In this case SOCME advises me that this would be a second line of defence, they wish to exhaust all objection procedures first in so far as I understand. In my opinion the Hemsby High Court precedent means that the Welsh Ministers cannot over-rule a 95% local opposition. Similarly, given the organization and the political will, the Pen y Cymoedd propsals could be fought to the House of Lords and European Human Rights Court.
Please feel free to use any material on www.aias.us and its blog that may help the cause.
=====================

Entry posted October 28, 2012 at 10:58 am


Carbon Dioxide does not Cause Global Warming
This is well known to real scientists, one very good summary is found on

The Westminster government has quietly dropped the entire global warming propaganda and plans more gas fired power stations, so there is no longer any need for wind turbines at all. The truth is that warming of the climate CAUSES higher carbon dioxide concentrations, not the other way around. In the geological past, e.g. 500 million years ago, carbon dioxide concentrations were twenty times higher than today (www.earthguide.ucsd.edu) without any catastrophic rise in temperature. There is no correlation between carbon dioxide concentration and global surface temperature. The atmosphere is not a greenhouse, it allows free flow of air, while a greenhouse is an enclosed space. There have been fraud, data laundering and misrepresentation by senior scientists and others. These must be prevented from having any further influence on society. They have already caused tremendous economic and environmental damage and are intellectually dishonest in the extreme. On 13th October this year the Daily Mail reported Met Office data showing that temperatures for the past fifteen years have been stable. This was based on data very quietly released by the Met Office, because it contradicts their scaremongering. The Met Office immediately asserted that the data, which show no warming, show warming after all, but in the future. This is a disgraceful farce. NASA data have shown recently that there is currently a dramatic cooling of the very high atmosphere due to a decrease in the sun’s activity. Climate changes in the past have been 10 to 20 times more severe than in the past century, and have occurred in as little as twenty years. The human race cannot do anything about that at all. Climate is always changing. So wind turbines were bred from scaremongering, and are useless and horribly destructive to landscape. They threaten the very basis of democracy. Finally, countries such have China have ignored the Kyoto accord and have poured sulphur dioxide into the atmosphere from coal burning (rubbishy coal, not anthracite as we have here in Wales). That has had the effect of grotesque pollution, and cooling the atmosphere with volumes of filthy smoke. So China should face condemnation from the rest of the world and people should not buy Chinese products.
=================== 

Entry posted October 28, 2012 at 8:45 am

The Economic Disaster of Wind Turbines

By googling around this becomes very obvious. For example, Obamanomics in the US has run up trillions of dollars in debt and lost ten thousand wind jobs because of outsourcing to other countries. The article in “American Thinker” (www.americanthinker.com) of Sept. 4th 2012 is among the best I have seen. It shows that after thirty years of development in California, over fourteen thousand turbines have been abandoned, they just spin as industrial junk, producing nothing, killing rare wildlife. Wind produces only 2.3% of CA’s energy needs after thirty years of development. Europe is dropping subsidies, resulting in catastrophic job losses and rises in sovereign debt, especially in Spain, Greece and Portugal, three bankrupt countries where people are reportedly looking for food in dustbins. After about ten years, the outage times of turbines gradually rise to 100%, i. e. they stop working. In 2009 for example B. P. fired 40,000 people in Spain after the government dropped subsidies by 30%. As I predicted, the wind turbines have to be demolished. The City of Palm Springs for example has enacted an Ordinance to have derelict turbines demolished. Some operators keep the turbines spinning just to keep oil flowing. They are not actually producing any electricity. Old wind farms cannibalize parts, so only the tower is left, without any blades. Many turbine companies in Europe are going bankrupt, and the new junk turbines flooding in from China are more unreliable than ever. Wind is currently nine times more expensive than gas, and massive new reserves of shale gas are being discovered all the time, enough for hundreds of years ahead. An enormous field of shale gas has been discovered in Britain, with its massive reserves of coal. The windy Scottish bagpipe economy is essentially bankrupt, and Salmonds’ green revolution is showing signs of gangrene. The Scottish landscape is an ugly ruin. What has happened on Betws is that the development has arrived just as subsidies are being dropped. So I predict that in a very few years Betws will be covered with rotting derelict junk, producing nothing. Then Neath Port Talbot Borough Council will be faced with a huge bill for demolition. The wind companies just cut and run and leave the rest of us to clean up their disgusting junk. New legislation must stop turbines, demolish existing wind farms, and make turbine executives personally responsible for debt. Bribed politicians must be exposed mercilessly and expelled from politics and society. Greedy pseudofarmers must be made to pay back their ill gotten subsidies to the government.
====================== 

2.0 Responses from AIAS Members on their PSI Status

Contact with AIAS was first made on 6th November 2012 in response to an article "AN EPIC WEEK OF SUCCESS FOR PSI" on 1st November by John O'Sullivan, "CEO & Legal Consultant" of blogging group Principia Scientific International. John claimed that " .. We’ve seen a sudden and most welcome influx of new members and we are now affiliated with the Alpha Institute for Advanced Studies .. ".

AIAS was asked to advise if that claim of John's was correct and the response from AIAS founder Dr. Myron Wyn Evans to AIAS members and others (62 recipients) was " .. We did our due diligence and decided not to join PSI but act as observers .. ". After it was pointed out to Dr. Evans (Ccd to others including PSI "Chairman" Dr. Tim Ball and "Compliance Officer" Philip Foster) that AIAS members were listed on the PSI web-site as PSI members (http://principia-scientific.org/about/why-psi-is-a-private-assoc.html) he responded on 8th November that " .. I informed Mr. O' Sullivan that the due diligence of PSI had resulted in AIAS deciding not to join it. Obviously, he should remove the names of AIAS colleagues from PSI. .. I have decided that from now on AIAS will not affiliate itself with any other institution. Individual Fellowships are awarded only after  a long assessment time, and to people who are capable and contribute positively  to new science .. ".

On 12th November PSI founding members were reminded of those misleading AIAS/PSI membership claims but still (2013-02-28) the names and bios of AIAS members remain on the list of claimed PSI members. On 23rd Feb. 2013 Victor Riecansky, owner of Cambridge International Science Publishing which publishes AIAS books and a journal, who is listed as a PSI member, was asked about this. On 24th he gave me his permission to say that he is NOT and has never been a member of PSI.


Victor is not the only AIAS member to deny being a member of PSI but there appears to be some reluctance among most AIAS members who have been contacted to make any comment.

For the full context of the extracts quoted in this section see Appendix A "AIAS E-mails about PSI Membership".


3.0 AIAS and other Affiliations

Several of the AIAS members listed as being PSI members (http://principia-scientific.org/about/why-psi-is-a-private-assoc.html) are also listed on the Board (http://www.telesio-galilei.com/tg/index.php/board-and-members) of the Telesio - Galilei Academy of Science, founded in September 2007 by “Francesco Fucilla, Founding Father (Scientist)”. That web-site also shows the 9 Telesio Galilei Academy Gold Medal Winners 2008, among whom are AIAS members “ .. Franklin Amador .. Kerry Pendergast .. Stephen Crothers .. Myron Wyn Evans.. ” (http://www.telesio-galilei.com/tg/index.php/academy-award-2008) all of whom are also listed as being PSI members.

That 2008 awards event was also reported on Dr. Evans’s blog (http://drmyronevans.wordpress.com/2008/04/11/santilli-galilei-awards-ceremony-of-the-7708/) and by BBC Wales (http://www.bbc.co.uk/wales/mid/sites/abercraf/pages/santilligalilei.shtml). At that time the relationship between Dr. Myron Evans’s AIAS and Francesco Fucilla’s Telesio - Galilei Academy appears to have been one of at least mutual respect. In his 2008 CV (http://www.telesio-galilei.com/tg/images/stories/photos/award2008/Myron_Wyn_Evans_CV.pdf) Dr. Evans mentioned that he was Chairman of the Santilli-Galilei Association and Director and Vice Chairman of Steriwave Plc. as well as his 2008 Santilli-Galilei Gold Medal and Prize for distinguished service to physics.

In February 2008 WalesOnline ran an article "Plan for new Welsh university" which said  " .. A CONTROVERSIAL academic has announced plans to establish his own university in Wales, funded by an oil multi-millionaire living in Florida .. Myron Evans, a doctor of chemistry living at Craigcefnparc near Swansea, has issued invitations to a launch event for the Myron Evans University, to be held at Craig-y-Nos Castle, near Ystradgynlais, Powys, in July .. The benefactor, Francesco Fucilla .. ” (http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/2008/02/26/plan-for-new-welsh-university-91466-20523036/).

The Evans-Fucilla relationship appears to have taken a turn for the worse in 2009. The “Francesco Fucilla  Satires” web-site includes a page of allegations “About Mr Myron Evans. Deliberated criminal campaign against Francesco Fucilla, his Family, Fellow Directors, Friends and Shareholders” (http://www.francesco-fucilla-satires.com/FFSatires_05-08-12/Statement_By_Prof_of_Profs/About%20Mr%20Myron%20Evans.pdf) which alleges attacks by Dr. Evans on Francesco Fucilla’s “ .. Family, Fellow Directors and Companies etc .. triggered when in 2009 we dismissed Mr Evans from Steriwave, Global energy and the Telesio Galilei Academy .. ”.

An article “The Reasons for the Attacks by Mr Myron Evans Against Professor Francesco Fucilla” provides some details behind those allegations QUOTE: ..

The attacks on Steriwave, Francesco Fucilla and Family started in 2009 soon after I proposed the appointment of Prof Rodrigues JR (The man that proved beyond doubts that Myron Evans kindergarten physics and mathematics was completely wrong) to the Chairmanship of Telesio Galilei Academy and Steriwave.

Prof Waldyr Alves Rodrigues JR, is a world leading Mathematician and Physicists, whose work has ridiculed the work of Mr Evans and the Alpha Institute of Advanced Studies of Mr Evans. See the case history documented and click on this link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein%E2%80%93Cartan%E2%80%93Evans_theory

I appointed Prof Rodrigues to replace Mr Evans, when in 2010 I personally got to realise that Mr Evans and the Alpha Institute of Kindergarten Studies were all incompetent physicists and mathematicians, exactly as stated by Prof Rodrigues Mignani, and many other leading scientists, that laugh at the nonsense he and his aias members publish daily .. UNQUOTE.

This apparent conflict between Evans and Fucilla looks to have embraced other groups of individuals, including the "Quantum Future Group" and the "Fellowship of the Cosmic Mind" (http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php). There are some interesting comments on the Caseopen Forum  web-site  (http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=27261.60) and on the "Francesco Fucilla Satires" pages (http://www.francesco-fucilla-satires.com/FFSatires_05-08-12/F_Fucilla_The_Truth.html).

TO BE UPDATED
meanwhile see:
- http://www.francesco-fucilla-satires.com/
- http://www.worldsci.org/php/index.php?tab0=Scientists&tab1=Display&id=1165

No comments:

Post a Comment

Open debate is encouraged but please be civil and if quoting from others please give a citation and provide a link when appropriate.

Followers